This piece is written for the generations. A lifetime is so short when trying to look at the big picture. What seems ridiculous to one generation can be seen as the norm of another. In the 1970’s; the idea that a dog owner would have to pick up their animals dropping with while walking their dog would have been laughable. These days its law and ‘Big Brother’ will find you and make sure that you do pick it up. At the same time, the introduction of a law requiring bicycle riders to wear helmets was seemed outrageous. “I’m not wearing those ‘dorky’ things” was the cry from teenagers worldwide. Today it’s second nature to put on a helmet for not only bike riding but skateboards and roller blades as well. 

Here we’ve seen a couple of basic social level generational changes and who knows, in thirty years from today we may have people policing public farts. We’ll just have to wait and see.

Basic social level changes are one thing, however, we need to understand that at the highest level of society there are also major levels of change taking place. Names like Rothschild and Rockefeller as commonly referred to when talking about the top 1% of the society who controls 99% of the world’s wealth.

It is worth doing some basic mathematics to get a broader understanding. According to the United States bureau of statistics, our current world population is seven billion (using the Western system of math’s; that is one billion equals nine zeros), so multiple that number by one percent. That gives us a figure of 70 million people who control the 95% of the world’s wealth.

Many of these plans for social control have failed first or second time around. The fight to establish a private federal reserve in the USA took over a century. President Andrew Jackson managed to kill the foreign interest banks during his presidency however the bankers regrouped and resorted to planning their next approach.

I will endeavour to write this piece in a timeline manner. My goal is to highlight how over the centuries we the ‘free people’ have lost our way through constant manipulation of our freedoms we are now slaves to the elite. There will be references to George Orwell book ‘1984’ throughout this piece as the parallels between lives in Australia today and Orwell’s fictional world are inescapable. I’m not an expert on anything. I’m just a simple man who’s become overly frustrated with the state of the world today. The late great comedian Bill Hicks put it well “I smoke, it that bothers you, take a good look at the world around you and shut the fuck up”.

At this point I’d like to state the global reality; money is an illusion. Money continues to decrease in its value the more it is printed. Money is printed OUT OF THIN by private reserve banks and then lent to governments and banks. The private reserve banks decide when to print/lend the money, how much money they will print/lend and what the money is to be spent on. They also determine the random interest rate they will charge the government and banks.  The government and banks have to repay the capital plus interest on the money they have borrowed from the private intuition who printed money out of thin air. The governments and banks then control the flow of this money by spending it into the community via loans to industry, building public projects and personal loans to individuals. Once again loans at this level are charged at capital plus interest. Given that all this money is continued to be printed out of nothing it is impossible to completely pay back the debts entirely.

70 million extremely wealthy people; what is the likelihood that they would all get along? Let’s be clear here, we are not talking about Bill Gates or Warren Buffet. These men are not the wealthiest men in the world; they are the wealthiest men who can’t afford to buy their names off the Forbes richest list. This is partly due to their public images, and partly due to the fact that they are ‘the new rich’. Their wealth means almost nothing when compared to that of families with centuries of wealth dating back to the renaissance and the industrial revolution. Gates and Buffett are their puppets.

So who are the super super rich? The fact is we really don’t know who these people are, we can guess at a few, e.g. The Catholic Church, The Hapsburg decedents and the Dutch royal family, The Rothschild’s and the Rockefellers. Digging a little bit deeper, we can look back to people who families own patents on our day to day item which we just take for granted. Things like locks, even specific locks used on bank vaults, railway builders, toothbrushes and toilet patents. This is just scratching the surface of the 70 million who control almost every aspect of our lives.

These people have all the money they need. What they really want is power. While war and disease are aids to population control in third world nations the world population continues to grow. Control of the first world people is easier. By creating a world of confusion through media control, first people (like Australians) are constantly distracted by ‘social issue’ manufacture by their media. Adding this there’s a strong emphasis on career, most households are two income families with very little time to their selves.

Division of the family is an important aspect of the super-rich. If you can destabilize a community at its root i.e. family, then unification of the people being controlled is far less likely. 

In 1832 Andrew Jackson 7th US President destroyed the European owned Central bank of the United States. By 1835 he had reduced their national debt to the lowest in history.

The bold effort the present (central) bank had made to control the government ... are but premonitions of the fate that await the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it. – Andrew Jackson – On January 30th, 1835 Richard Lawrence attempted to assassinate President Jackson. Both his guns misfired and Jackson brought him to ground. At trial, Lawrence was found "not guilty by reason of insanity." 

When Jackson was asked years later what he considered to be his greatest achievement as President, he simply replied “I killed the banks”.

During the American Civil war, Abraham Lincoln refuse loan offers from European banks. In 1862 Lincoln issue debt free the United States notes called ‘greenbacks’ to pay the cost of the Civil War.

“The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. …. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts, and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power.” – Abraham Lincoln.

20th President of the United States James Garfield was outspoken about the control of the United States by the foreign interest banks.

 “Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce...when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.” - James Garfield.

On 19th September 1881 only a few weeks after making this statement Garfield was assassinated.

  

While the super-rich may not get along they do meet on regular basis through groups like The Bilderberg Group, The council on foreign relations, the Trilateral Commission, the International Monetary Fund, The World Economic Forum and Bohemian Grove just to name few. They have specific agendas for the world.

War is important, war makes money for the elites and it is one form of population control.

Eugenics and population control are of extreme importance to the elite. The goal is to reduce population globally and control the minds of their unwitting subjects.  Aldus Huxley wrote in his 1931 book ‘Brave New World’ “A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced because they love their servitude.”

While the book is considered fiction, Huxley conceded that the book was based on current eugenics plans. Hitler was a big fan of eugenics.

Huxley and Orwell wrote books that appeared to be fiction, however, there was a relationship between them. Huxley taught French at Eton College to Eric Arthur Blair (George Orwell). Huxley introduced Orwell to the Fabians society. This was the knowledge base where both men got their concepts for their books. It is said that Orwell wrote 1984 to rebel against the beliefs of the Fabians, 1984 being exactly 100 years after the creation of the Fabian Society.

 

We are looking at a world where all countries have a national debt. If there is a debt there has to be a creditor and that’s where the power lies. Almost every country in the world has a government who borrow money from privately owned reserve banks, local and foreign. 

    

 The Federal Reserve of America is a privately owned institution. The idea behind ‘The Fed’ is that it acts as a ‘bank of lending of last resort’.

Should there be a ‘rush’ on a bank for one reason or another, then the bank needs to provide a larger amount of physical cash to meet its customer’s demands. The Federal Reserve will then print money, with nothing more than a print press and a diary entry signifying a debt owed, and then loan it to the US Government. The US government then loans this money to member banks, which are experiencing a larger than normal demand for cash from their customers. The Bank is then obligated to pay back this money to the U.S Treasury at a prescribed rate of interest. The interest rate is determined by the Federal Reserve Bank. The US Government, via the treasury, is then obligated to pay back its loan to The Federal reserve again at the interest rate determined by ‘The Fed’.

The banking system used by ‘The Fed’ is known as Fractional reserve banking.

According to Devvy Kidd in her book “Why a Bankrupt America”, If the Federal Reserve wants to print 1,000 one-hundred ($100) bills, their total cost for ink, paper, plates, labour, etc. would be approximately $23.00. Now, if you do the math, the total cost of 10,000 bills would be $230.00 ($.023 x 10,000). But, and here's the catch - 10,000 $100 bills equals $1,000,000! So, the Federal Reserve can "create" a million dollars, and then lend it to the U.S. Government (with interest) for a total cost of $230.00.”

How did this great deception come about?

Evidence of Fractional reserve banking has been found in Cuneiform tablets dating as far back as ancient Babylon. The practice was widespread across the Middle East. It is worth noting, that Jesus threw the moneychangers out the temple and was crucified within a week. Following the rise of the Christian era across Europe, the practice of usury, that is, the practice of lending of money at an exorbitant interest rate was outlawed.

During the 16th century in Europe, at the dawn the renaissance and the forerunner of the industrial revolution, Goldsmiths started storing gold for customers. The Goldsmiths would store the gold, guaranteeing its security for a fee, and give out receipts for the gold to its customers. E.g. if 10 ounces of gold was be stored with Goldsmith, the Goldsmith would the give the customer a receipt for the 10oz of gold. These receipts then became acceptable as a means of exchange as it was easier and safety to use. This was the birth of paper money. It was also 100% backed by gold, hence the creation of the gold standard.

If a Goldsmith had 1000oz of gold that they were keeping for their customers, then the goldsmith would also have a record of receipts totalling 1000oz of gold. The value of the gold and paper was at a 1:1 ratio this is known as the gold standard, an equal amount of gold to receipts. It was not long before goldsmiths started writing receipts for gold that they did not have and then loaning these receipts out for a fee.

A Goldsmith who had 1000oz of gold could have receipts to the value of 2000oz circulating in the public domain, and thus doubling the profit base and charge interest rates on top. This meant that only half of their money/receipts were actually backed by physical gold. At this point receipts/paper money ceased being redeemable on a 1 to 1 basis with gold and took on a value of its own while still maintaining the illusion that it was directly exchangeable for gold.

This scenario has paper at a 2:1 ratio with gold; only 50% of the receipts/paper money in circulation at any given time could be exchanged for gold. This was the birth of ‘Fractional Reserve Banking’. The reserve being 50%, here for money was no long wedded to the gold standard and had taken on a unique value of its own.

Many banks did fold as a result of customers seeking to exchange their paper money for gold and banks not being able to provide the gold were driven into bankruptcy. However, Europe was at this time, experience monumental change.

Guttenberg’s printing presses gave education to the previously ignorant masses, feudalism fell, with the reformation of the church, wars broke out all over the Christian states, and the dawning of the industrial revolution provoked unprecedented demand for the building of railways, roads, and bridges etc. Furthermore, industrialisation motivated unprecedented demand for steel and other commodities and manufacturing of these commodities.

All of these changes required financial backing. The nobility of Europe were left with the options of, being left behind in the dark ages as the rest of Europe advanced, or loaning money from banks to grow. This created a debt that would have to be paid back at interest determined by the bankers at a later date. As Europe industrialised and waged war, trade between European powers increased rapidly, so did alliances, and so did the debt to the bankers the governing bodies of Europe were responsible for. At this point, the direction of social structure was now being determined by the bankers who were lending money based upon specific requirements. Bankers were known to back both sides in wars and therefore it mattered little to them who won the war, profiteering was assured.

One such Goldsmith was Mayer Amschel Bauer (1743-1812), Bauer who changed his name to Rothschild and aligned himself this Adam Weishaupt. Weishaupt is credited with being the founder of the Barvian Illuminati, and organisation whose aim was, and still is world domination.

Rothschild became a banking agent for Prince William of Hanau who was closely related to the various royal families of Europe. History has recorded that William of Hanau, for a price, would rent out troops to any nation. His best customer was the British government which wanted troops for such projects as trying to keep the American colonists in line. When William was forced to flee to Denmark, he left 600,000 pounds (then valued at $3,000,000) with Rothschild for safekeeping. Rothschild then took this money which had already be embezzled by William from his troops and set about a drastic expansion of his own operations thus becoming the first truly international banker.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild has been reported to have said, ‘Give me control of the economics of a country, and I care not who makes her laws.”

Mayer Rothschild had 10 children, five sons. He then sent these five sons to five major cities of Europe to establish branches of the Rothschild bank firm.

1st Son Amschel Rothschild remained in Germany where he funded Otto Von Bismarck in his unification of Germany and subsequent economic success.

2nd Son Salomon Rothschild when to Vienna, Austria where he became a leader in the Austria-Hungry Empire.

3rd Son Nathan Mayer Rothschild was sent to England where he gained control of the Bank of England.

At the battle of Waterloo, Wellington’s army was funded by Nathan Rothschild. The significance of the battle of Waterloo should not be understated. Napoleon's return (Partly funded by the French Rothschilds) provoked great instability throughout Europe, which was still reeling from the Napoleonic Wars.

Had the British Empire failed to subdue Napoleon's advances and win a decisive victory, then its position as the most powerful empire on earth would have been seriously challenged and thus confidence in its security as a stable financial investment would have also been severely damaged.

 There are a number of different scenarios about the conclusion of the battle of Waterloo and its outcome being conveyed to Nathan Rothschild. These include the possibility that the Rothschild’s used carrier pidgins to convey information faster than anyone else. Whatever the method used one fact remains solid. Rothschild as the financial backer of Wellington’s army had representatives at the battle and upon Wellington victory got the outcome to Rothschild prior to the rest of the English public knowing.

Nathan Rothschild and his associates then attended the London Stock Exchange the next day and began selling up their stock holdings. Rothschild was by this point well established in London, stock punters were well aware of his knowledge and financial influence, so when it became obvious that Rothschild was selling his shares the conclusion was reached that Rothschild knew something. With Rothschild selling up, punters assumed the Napoleon had won the battle, and England was no longer the financial powerhouse that it had been. This belief spread like ‘wildfire’ throughout the London Stock Exchange and people began selling everything, consequently, all stock values began to plummet.

This caused a rush on the Bank of England as investors tried to exchange their shares, which they now believed were worthless, for English pounds. At the end of the day’s trading the London Stock Exchanged had dropped 90% of its value from the start of the day and the Bank of England was in ruin as a result of its Fractional reserve banking policy. It was at this point that Rothschild bought up all the devalued stock and bailed out the Bank of England. Later that night the news filtered through to England that Wellington had won, however by now Nathan Rothschild had secured control of the London Stock Exchange and Bank of England.

It is this sought of trickery that prompted Frederick Morton to write in his book, ‘The Rothschilds’ “….the wealth of the Rothschilds consists of the bankruptcy of nations.”

Baron Nathan Mayer Rothschild boasted:

"I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man that controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply."

4th Son Carl Rothschild was sent Naples where he became the most powerful banker in Italy gaining control of the Papal States financial affairs.

5th Son James Jacob Rothschild went to Paris where he established the Central bank of France.

Having secured the financial control of Europe the Rothschild along with a number of other high-profile international bankers from Europe e.g. Warburg’s, etc. decide to turn their attention to the new colonies of America. There had been a number of attempts by international bankers to establish a central bank in the Americas throughout the 1800’s. Many colonialists refused to accept a centralised banking system and saw it as a tool of the European Bankers trying to obtain financial control of their fledgling independent nation. Fractional reserve banking did, however, take root in the new colonies much to the disdain of America’s founding fathers. 

With International bankers taking root in the colonies of America President Andrew Jackson (1829-37) made the comment 'If the American people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system - there would be a revolution before morning...';

In 1834 after the failure of two Centralised banking systems, America established a gold standard of its own. $1 was worth approximately 1/20 of an ounce of gold. This was a fixed rate of exchange and therefore could not be inflated by governments wanting to increase their spending. In 1862 however, Abraham Lincoln left the gold standard and started printing money backed by nothing (Greenbacks) as a means of funding the unification of the South.

Lincoln asked Congress to pass a law authorizing the printing of full legal tender Treasury notes. Lincoln said at that time: "We gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they ever had - their own paper money to pay their own debts..." These Treasury notes were printed with green ink on the back so the people called them "greenbacks" - debt free and interest-free and paid the soldiers, U.S. government employees - and bought supplies for the war... this displeased the international bankers who had wanted Lincoln to borrow the money from them so the American people would owe endless interest on the loan...Lincoln was assassinated after the war by an individual history showed had ties to the secret societies of Europe - John Wilkes Booth. After Lincoln's assassination, the government was induced to revoke the debt-free, interest-free greenbacks."

http://www.sovereignfellowship.com/tos.php?sec=47

Lincoln’s law, passed by the congress was the ‘National Banking Act’. While the international bankers were outraged by Lincoln’s actions, the idea of printing money backed by no securities was later to be adopted by this cartel, as the ‘National Banking Act’ had made it legal for a private corporation to issue money.

Though slavery is generally regarded as the catalyst for the American civil war the truth is far from it. The North was partly funded by the Bank of England and the South by the French Rothschilds. Slavery was used as a ‘divide and conquer’ strategy to destabilise the North and South. The Rothschild’s was heavy involved in the slave trade to the colonies and therefore could cease the trade at any time.

Through the late 1800’s John Davison Rockefeller grew a monopoly based upon his ownership of 90% of the world’s crude oil. Rockefeller took his profits from Standard oil and started to pursue an interest in Banking. Rockefeller along with JP Morgan (an agent of Rothschild) began campaigning for a Central bank. To highlight the need for this Rockefeller and Morgan organised a number of Stock market crashes that caused a number of banks to fail.

In 1907 there was a run on New York’s biggest banks based upon their fractional reserve holdings. The larger city banks refused to honour demands for payment or cash for checks from depositors. This caused a chain reaction that forced smaller rural banks to do the same. The smaller banks being left with no option but to comply as they themselves banked with the larger city banks. This caused widespread panic and dissatisfaction with the current banking system. The government was then forced to Act.

Wall Street used the failure of these banks as a means of selling the American public on the need for a central bank, highlighting that a ‘lender of last resort’ could bail out banks that were insolvent and therefore protect its customers from losing their saving. What was not highlighted was that the fear of bankruptcy is what kept banks responsible for their own debts and forced them to adhere to strict monetary policies that prevented them from taking unnecessary or dangerous risks with their depositors saving. A central bank would then act as a ‘safety net’ for banks that deviated from these policies and acted irresponsibly, thus making banking responsibilities weaker.

Nelson Wilmarth Aldrich (JD Rockefeller’s father-in-law) was an American businessman and republican politician. Aldrich wielded enormous power in the Senate. Interested in establishing a central bank in the United States, he became chairman of the National Monetary Commission in 1908 (Set up as a result of the previous year’s banking failures). This commission, consisting of 16 Congressman hand-picked by Aldrich, was chartered to study monetary systems and recommend long-term solutions to the Nations "banking problems". Its report, the so-called Aldrich Plan (1911), served as the basis of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

In 1910, on Jekyl Island, Georgia, A meeting organised by the two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn, Loeb & Co. took place between Senator Aldrich, Assistant secretary of the Treasury; Frank Vanderlip, President of the National City Bank of New York, Paul Moritz Warburg (A German banker who was acting under orders from and financed by the Rothschild family), Benjamin Strong (J.P. Morgan), and number of other representatives of the world’s high-powered banking establishment. The basis for this meeting was to write an act establishing the Federal Reserve Bank. At the end of the week, a Bill was written called the ’Aldrich Bill’ this was the forerunner to the Federal Reserve act.

Following this meeting, an ‘education’ fund of $5 million was set up by the big banks of New York to finance the number the nation’s university leading professors to endorse the new bank.

Woodrow Wilson at Princeton University was one of the first to endorse the Bill. ‘The Aldrich Bill’ however, failed to convince the congress and was quickly identified as ‘the banker’s bill’, a bill to benefit the few, at the expense of many. The Bill was described as the following by Congressman Charles Lindbergh:

“The Aldrich plan is the wall street plan. It means another panic, if necessary, to intimidate the people. Aldrich, paid by the government to represent the people, proposes a plan for the trusts instead”

The Republicans realising that they didn’t have the votes to win in congress never bought the Aldrich Bill to a vote. Instead, The Bankers decided to endorse Woodrow Wilson as the Democratic candidate for President. The commitment to the people of America that there would be no Central Bank was one of the campaign promises that Woodrow Wilson and the Democratic Party used won office.

December 23, 1913, Just days before Christmas, when much of the senate was on vacation, having being told that nothing would be done about the new Bill until well into the new year,  President Woodrow Wilson signed the Owen-Glass Act, Creating the Federal Reserve System. A few years later, Wilson, referring to the Federal Reserve said, "I have unwittingly ruined my country".

Congressman Charles Lindbergh described the passing as the bill as such: “This act establishes the most powerful trust on earth.  When the president signs this bill, the invisible government by the money powers will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately, the but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed…..The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetuated by this banking bill”

Who owns the Federal Reserve banks?

1. Rothschild Bank of London

2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg

3. Rothschild Bank of Berlin

4. Lehman Brothers of New York

5. Lazard Brothers of Paris

6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York

7. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy

8. Goldman, Sachs of New York

9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam

10. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York.

There were twelve regional reserve banks established around America: Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Richmond, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Chicago, Cleveland, St Louis, Kansas City, Dallas and San Francisco.

At the Federal Reserve’s own Website, on the frequently asked questions page, under the “Question who owns the Federal Reserve?” The following expansion is given, “The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. Instead, it is an independent entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects.”

This appears to be a classic example of George Orwell’s “Doublespeak” in his book 1984. Here an obvious question then, How can an organisation, be independent of the government and not be private?

Continuing with its answer to the question, the site goes on to say “It is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms. However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by the Congress” If ‘The Fed’ do not receive funding from the congress, then who is funding it? 

The Federal Reserve, being subject to oversight by congress, sounds like a protection device for the people, however, in its entire 102-year history of the Federal Reserve has not been audited once. It is not that the proposal to audit ‘The Fed’ hasn’t been table before congress, it’s just that those who do put the proposals forward end up losing their seats before any action can be taken. Their opposition seems to always win at the next congressional election. There are also those, like Congressman Larry McDonald, who died suddenly, shortly after tabling the motion.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve in Washington DC control and regulate their activities. The board is made up of seven members appointed by the president. In order to fool the people into believing that the government had control over ‘The Fed’, the plan called for ‘The Fed’ to be run by a board of governors appointed by the president and approved by the senate. But all the bankers had to do was ensure that their men got appointed to the board of governors. That was pretty easy; bankers have money and therefore can buy their way into politics via significant campaign contributions, and this is what took place.

Just weeks before the passing of the Glass-Owen Bill, Congress had pushed through a law making income tax legal. This law was never ratified and therefore the IRS and the payment of tax is illegal. This law was also championed by Nelson Wilmarth Aldrich. The law was important because bankers now had in place a system (The Federal Reserve Bank) that would run up a virtually unlimited federal debt.

Up until the creation of the Federal Reserve, the federal government was small and was paid for by tariffs and excise taxes. To ensure that the interest would be paid on this new debt (The debt being the money or principle as created out of thin air by the Fed), a guarantee, by the US government, of being able to pay this debt was required by the bankers /The Fed. Income taxes, taxing the citizens of the United States directly, were the way the government guaranteed their ability to repay the private bankers for the loans that those bankers gave the government. Taxing the people directly also stopped individual states from opposing the new structure. Guaranteeing the loan via direct taxation of the people of the United States was a copy of the same system adopted by the Bank of England 250 years earlier.

A year after the creation of the Federal Reserve Bill, Congressman Lindbergh describe what is known today as the business cycle “To cause high prices, all the Federal reserve will do will be to lower the rediscount rate…, producing an expansion of credit and raising the stock market, then when… business men are adjusted to these conditions, it can check… prosperity in mid-career by arbitrarily raising the rate of interest”

”It can cause the pendulum of a rising and falling market to swing gently back a forth by slight changes in the discount rate, or cause violent fluctuations by a greater rate variation, and in either case it will possess inside information as to the financial conditions and advance knowledge of the coming changes, either up or down.”

”This is the strangest, most dangerous advantage ever placed in the hands of a specials privilege class by any government that ever existed.”

“The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people’s money.”

”They know in advance when to create panics to their advantage. They also know when to stop the panic. Inflation and deflation work equally well for them when they control finance….” Congressman Charles August Lindbergh.

Lindbergh did not realize that most European nations had already been seduced by the same form of economic trickery via the International bankers years or centuries earlier. He also mentioned that ‘the Fed’, within one year of its creation had already cornered the market on gold. “Already the Federal Reserve Bank has cornered the gold and gold certificated.”

Despite there being 12 banks, New York, via Wall Street, some become the dominant supplier. As president of the New Fed Benjamin Strong (A Morgan protégé) seized control of the board’s open market committee operations. Strong retained the dominant force at ’The Fed’ until his death1928.

The Federal open market committee is responsible for directing the purchase and sale of government securities on the open market. To inflate the supply of money and credit, ‘The Fed’ buys securities from a few handpicked firms with newly created money (it is important to remember here that ‘The Fed’ actually print the money and then loan it to the government at an interest rate determined by The Fed). To tighten money and credit, ‘The Fed’ sells securities, this is done entirely at ‘The Fed’s’ discretion.

The discount rate is the interest rate set by ‘The Fed’ to member banks when they borrow short term from ‘The Fed’ thru the ‘discount window’. If the Fed lowers the discount rate for loans the commercial banks are more likely to borrow more from ‘The Fed’. This translates into more money in circulation and lower interest rates on loans and credit card. The increase in money to lend translates into more money in the economy.

‘The Fed’ can also manipulate the nation’s money supply by raising or lowering the reserve requirement. Banks are required to set aside a percentage of their deposits as reserves to meet their depositor’s demands.

There were more critics of ‘The Fed’ then Lindbergh however, Congressman Louis McFadden chairman of the house banking and currency committee from 1920-31 said that the Federal Reserve Act brought about “A super-state controlled by international banker and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure” McFadden saw the international aspect of the Federal Reserve.

Furthermore, This from Thomas Edison “If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good, also. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets money brokers collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20%, whereas the currency pays nobody but those who contribute directly in some useful way.”

“It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30 million dollars in bonds and $30 million in currency. Both are promises to pay, but one promise fattens the usurers and the other helps the people”.

And even Woodrow Wilson on seeing the outcome of his creation. “Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so complete, and so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it”.

The Federal Government suddenly had a huge influx of money into Washington via personal income tax from the people and an unlimited amount of money being created via ‘The Fed’. It was now time for a war. Wars are great for Central bankers; political issues take a backseat for bankers because nothing creates debt as much as war does. War gives bankers and governments a reason to abandon the gold standard, and just start printing massive amounts of money to pay soldiers, buy war supplies help allies etc.

In World War I, The British Rothschilds loaned money to the British government, The German Rothschild load money to the German government and the French Rothschilds loaned money to the French Government. In America, JP Morgan was the sales agent for war materials to both The British and The French. Six months into the war, Morgan became the largest consumer on earth spending $10 million dollars a day. His officers were mobbed by brokers and sales people trying to cut a deal. Bernard M. Baruch (1870–1965), was appointed by President Wilson, to head the ‘War Industries Board’ which controlled the industrial establishment of the country for three years. According to historian James Perloff, the Rockefellers and Baruch profited by $200 million dollars during the war.

Profit was one aspect of the war for the Central banks, however revenge and greater economic control were also part of the plan. Russia was the last of the European nations to not surrender their sovereignty to the privately owned independent bank scheme. Russia, who had given assistance to Lincoln during the America Civil War, as they were both fighting the same enemy, (The Rothschilds central banking system), now had to pay for its interference in the global central bank expansion. Three years after World War I broke out the Russian revolution toppled the Tsar of Russia and communism took root in Russia. All funded by private reserve banks.

As World War I raged on, Leon Trotsky was in New York City writing for a Communist newspaper and regularly keeping company with Jacob Schiff (Kuhn Loeb and Co). Schiff bragged from his death bed that he had contributed over $20 Million towards the defeat of the Czar. Neither Lenin nor Trotsky went to Russia because the poor, huddled masses begged for their help, but only arrived later after being sent by the powerful elite in Europe and the U.S. Trotsky, married the daughter of one of Rothschild's closest associates, banker Abram Zhivotovsky and became part of the Illuminati clan.

National Communists like Lenin got in the way, however. Lenin overruled Trotsky and made peace with Germany (Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, 1918.). Lenin soon came to understand that although he was the dictator of Russia, there was someone else pulling the financial strings. This is evident in the following quote “The state does not function as we desire. The car does not obey. A man is at the wheel and seems to lead it, but the car does not drive in the desired direction. It moves as another force wishes” – Vladimir Lenin.

Louis McFadden exposed this situation to Americans when he said “The course of Russian history has, indeed, been greatly affected by the operations of the international bankers…..The Soviet Government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board... Acting through the Chase Bank (Rockefeller)”

“England has drawn money from us through the Federal Reserve banks and has re-lent it at high rates of interest to the Soviet Government…The Dnieper story Dam was built with funds unlawfully taken from the United States Treasury by the corrupt and dishonest Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve Banks”.

This scenario begs the question, why would the ambassadors of capitalism install a communist style government structure when theoretic communism is capitalism's sworn enemy. The answer is simple, if you are to view communism as a control the wealth philosophy, which it is, and has to be to work, rather than a share the wealth situation, then the paradox of capitalists funding communism is no longer a contradiction but merely another form a social control and economic expansion.

Following World War I, The Central banks had won control of the financial structures of many nations. It was now time to create a world government. At The Paris peace conference, the proposal to initiate a World government was giving top priority. The idea of the League of Nations was put forward. Nationalism, however, won out, much to the surprise of Paul Warburg and Bernard Baruch, who attended the conference with President Wilson. The US congress refused to ratify the League of Nations and without financial contribution from the US, the League of Nations died.

Enter the roaring Twenties. With a new Republican President, Warren Harding (1921-23), who opposed the League of Nations, America, set about an unprecedented period of economic growth and prosperity. This was in spite of the fact that America, as a result of the war now had a debt 10 times the size of its civil war debt.

After his election, Harding, reduced income tax and increased tariffs to record highs. This plan worked well to pay off foreign debt without transferring the debt to the American people. Harding, however, died in what appears to questionable circumstances, during his second year in office. No autopsy was performed and different sources put his death down to pneumonia, food poison, and even a heart attack. His Vice President Calvin Coolidge (1923-29) continued his policies and over that eight year period, the American debt was reduced by 38% the most significant reduction ever achieved by any administration. However feeding the economic posterity was the Federal Reserve, who had increased the money supply by 65% over this period.

Before his death in 1919, former President Theodore Roosevelt, warned the people of America what was going on. As reported in the New York Times of 20th March 1923 “These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interest control the majority of newspapers and columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of the public offices officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government” however, no-one was prepared to pay attention to the warnings during this time of prosperity.

As a result of this prosperity businesses where expanding and using large amounts of credit to do so. In July 1929 Paul Warburg sent out a secret advisory to his friends that a collapse was imminent. It is not a coincidence the Wall Street giants of this era, JD Rockefeller, Joseph Kennedy, Bernard Baruch, and JP Morgan etc. took their stocks and converted them to cash and gold shortly before the crash.

In August of 1929, The Federal Reserve began to tighten the money supply. On 24th October of 1929, the big New York bankers called in their 24-hour broker call loans, this meant that all the brokers and customers had to dump their stocks on the market at whatever cost they could get to repay the loans. As a result, the market tumbled at the day is known as ‘Black Thursday’. The money didn’t go missing however, it had merely be reallocated to a far smaller minority. For example during the period of 1929-1933 Joseph Kennedy’s personal wealth grow from $40 million to $100 million.

“The Federal Reserve definitely caused the Great depression by contracting the about of currency in circulation by one-third from 1929 to 1933” Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize winning economist.

America had been considered a safe haven for gold during the war, and many European nations had shipped their gold there for safe keeping. Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England from 1920 to 1949 met frequently with Benjamin Strong of the Federal Reserve of New York. Norman was determined to retrieve the gold lost by Britain to America during the war.

On September 21st, 1931 Great Britain came off the gold standard. The effect was an instant devaluing of the British pound worldwide.  Within Britain, this action stimulated manufacturing and exports and so create some relief during the depression. Suddenly the rest of the world was flooded with British manufactured goods. Internationally, however, the devaluation of the pound was costly for these people who had invested in the pound based upon its tie to gold. Many Europeans pulled their money from the pound and invested it in the USA gold back dollar, then immediately converted the currency into gold. The result in the US was disastrous. Gold flowed out of the US to Europe. With less gold in the US, the dollar became devalued, as did its agricultural and industrial.

In 1694 the bank of England was created. This was the birth of our current money system, a privately owned bank.  This was accomplished but the Dutch William of Orange invading England. The Stuarts were overthrown and the private bank was established with its owners remaining a secret to this day. Although the owner’s names have never been revealed, it would be fair to assume the Dutch royal family would have been one investor. Given the time period and the strength of the Hapsburg Empire, it is more than likely their family was also involved.

Regardless of to whom the initial investors were; from the day the bank was established the monitory system in England was totally changed. Suddenly prices of products and services skyrocketed.

By the mid-1700’s The English government was in massive debt to the privately owned Bank of England. They turned their attention to the new colonies of America.

The Rothschild’s financed Cecil Rhodes so he could establish a monopoly over the gold and steel mills of South Africa. They also financed the Harriman railways, Carnegie in steel and JP Morgan in banking.

How to fix this situation? Abolish private central reserve banks. The government should print the money; however, this may be easy to say, however ‘the powers that be’ will not surrender easily. Given that these people who operate in the shadows, the have time and time again.

"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."

Prince Phillip of England, Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August 1988.

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government”.

David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June 1991.

On 4th June 1963, President John F Kennedy signed ‘Executive order 11110’ which grant the ‘United States notes’ backed by silver reserves to be printed by the US Treasury. In doing this Kennedy was attempting to break away from having to borrow money from the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. Within five months $4.3 billion debt free Untied States notes were issued. Then on 22nd November 1963, Kennedy was assassinated. Following the assassination, the Silverback debt free notes were removed from circulation. Allow the Executive order still stands no President since Kennedy has attempted to enact it.

The media play a key role in this.

          

It is safe to predict that Monday, September 21, 1931, will become a historic date; the suspension of the gold standard in Great Britain on that day,

Andrew Jackson

James Garfield

Abraham Lincoln

Woodrow Wilson

Mayer Amschel Bauer (Rothschild)

Nathan Mayer Rothschild

Charles August Lindbergh

Louis Thomas McFadden

  • White Facebook Icon
  • White Twitter Icon
  • White Pinterest Icon
  • White Instagram Icon

© 2017 by Spencorp Media Proudly created with Wix.com